So maybe 2028 Camaro looks like this

[ARC]

6th Gen was too athletic for most muscle car buyers.

They just wanted some big comfy TV chairs attached to a big loud V8.

 

[3rdgennut]

auto writers like hondas and toyotas with a sprinkel of supercars for click bait.
they are the reason mustangs and jeeps cost 45k. morons... every single one.

 

[ARC]

In 1993, the V8-powered Chevrolet Camaro Z28 started at an incredibly affordable base price of $16,779. When adjusted for inflation to 2026 dollars, that equals roughly $38,920 for a base model, or about $44,700 for a well-optioned version with power features and air conditioning.

 

[102SS]

6th Gen was too athletic for most muscle car buyers.

They just wanted some big comfy TV chairs attached to a big loud V8.

They sold a lot of 5th Gens to Pro Athletes
I remember when it launched the players lot at Highmark Stadium was full of them.

 

[ARC]

Athletes don't always want an agile athletic car. Sometimes they want comfy couch on wheels after a hard day chasing a ball.

 

[102SS]

Athletes don't always want an agile athletic car. Sometimes they want comfy couch on wheels after a hard day chasing a ball.

Plus they could fit in it

 

[arpad_m]

While I love my 6th Gen.

GM would have likely sold more Camaros if they just kept the 5th Gen around as long as the Challenger.

It was bigger with more interior space and more retro if they kept round headlights and Corvette-like taillights.

Most Camaro owners just wanted that with some mechanical updates, special editions, new wheels, and new colors every few years.

If I don't misremember, the Zeta platform that the 5th gen was built on was not sustainable, because it physically couldn't be tweaked to pass incoming regulations. GM had to design a new architecture regardless of sales volumes.

That said, much as I love the 6th gen and think it's borderline perfect, I must be intellectually honest and admit that you're making a good point here. A hypothetical "5th gen refresh #2" may have been more successful than the 6th gen, scorching Nürburgring times and general 1LE prowess notwithstanding.

Still, instead of holding on to ancient designs Dodge style, my solution would've been a more substantial 6th gen refresh in 2019 or 2020 with minor chassis changes (slightly lower beltline and higher roofline), split taillights and the resulting wider trunk opening, fixed interior gotchas (general storage, wireless charging, console redesign) a bit more tech (digital cluster, larger screen that doesn't tilt forward), and maybe a little power bump, say, a bigger supercharger for the ZL1 and a slightly larger, more capable LTG variant.

Would that have been enough to save the 6th gen? We'll never know, but chances are the usual complaints would've practically ceased...

 

[Number 3]

Nope. Just sell more Malibu's. They sell even better then the Charger just drop more powerful engine in it and all the "wish it were a Camaro dads" can pretend.

They discontinued the Malibu a year or so ago.

 

[ARC]

5Gen was made in Canada based on Holden Zeta chassis. Between GM killing Holden and GMs new USA Caddy sedan factory having spare capacity, the 5Gen was likely killed 5 years too soon.

The round headlight and corvette taillights 5Gen Camaro would have likely still outsold the 6th up to 2024. Likely would have taken more sales away from the Dodge Challenger.

 

[arpad_m]

5Gen was made in Canada based on Holden Zeta chassis. Between GM killing Holden and GMs new USA Caddy sedan factory having spare capacity, the 5Gen was likely killed 5 years too soon.

The round headlight and corvette taillights 5Gen Camaro would have likely still outsold the 6th up to 2024. Likely would have taken more sales away from the Dodge Challenger.

Those lights look dated even when replaced with aftermarket LED counterparts. Nostalgia alone doesn't sell more cars, even in the shrinking muscle and sports car market.

 

[ARC]

2010-2012 likely had the best light and grill design. The rear quad lights look better with the chrome removed