Engine options for 7th gen Camaro

[dwlissick]

One thing we mustn't forget is that a new Camaro can't start at $50-60K, it isn't and shouldn't be a Corvette. In 2016, the base trim of the Camaro was well under $30K, specifically $26,695 for the four-banger and $28,190 for the V6.

While this wouldn't be realistic in 2027-2028, price was one of the additional reasons the car didn't sell well enough, as younger buyers less likely to be disappointed by the car's shortcomings, perceived or real.

If GM offered an attractive 7th gen base Camaro for under $35K, I think that would be low enough to drive more "baseline" sales, which could then sustain a low selling top end V8 and FI V8 combo.

I think they already did that. Wasn't the LT1 around that price? And that sold a ton I believe. Ditch the 4 and 6 cylinder and make a "LT" base model wit the V8 engine, make the RS package an option as before. Then make the 1SS and 2SS with RS package as standard like before. I've seen enough people buy the 4 and 6 cylinders and express deep regret, and they often put ZL1 bumpers and brembos on it, among other things.. Making the V8 affordable for everyone is the way to go.

 

[arpad_m]

You're not wrong, it's just difficult to believe that a "V8 for everyone" strategy would work. The (incredibly confusingly named) LT1 trim was a relative success, and GM should've thought of it much sooner, but in 2027-2028 I'm afraid one can no longer get away with such a minimalistic trim. (BTW I edited my previous post, because I left out a full sentence, no idea where it went. sorry.)

Yes, I know, old school V8 enthusiasts don't care about plastics and 90s style 3" DIC screens and crappy audio etc., some would probably be okay even with cranking their windows by hand, but whether there are enough of them in Gen Z and Gen Alpha to sustain a no-frills Camaro in 2028 and ahead, that is the big question.

One thing I always wondered, especially after seeing the 45-minute 6th gen factory tour video, is that since the car is already built to order, every car on the line is different with matching large parts trays traveling along each vehicle, why we couldn't have more freedom in optioning each Camaro. For example, I could've chosen the 2SS trim with 1LE seats but a leather steering wheel, no electronic diff, light gray door cards and headliner to open up the interior a bit, and so on.

This way even a barebones trim could be optioned exactly as people want it and not have to jump right into the 2SS price range for something trivial like a HomeLink transmitter. Allowing more or ideally full customization didn't look particularly expensive, again, given how it's already being catered to, just within artificial limits.

I think they already did that. Wasn't the LT1 around that price? And that sold a ton I believe. Ditch the 4 and 6 cylinder and make a "LT" base model wit the V8 engine, make the RS package an option as before. Then make the 1SS and 2SS with RS package as standard like before. I've seen enough people buy the 4 and 6 cylinders and express deep regret, and they often put ZL1 bumpers and brembos on it, among other things.. Making the V8 affordable for everyone is the way to go.

 

[dwlissick]

You're not wrong, it's just difficult to believe that a "V8 for everyone" strategy would work. The (incredibly confusingly named) LT1 trim was a relative success, and GM should've thought of it much sooner, but in 2027-2028 I'm afraid one can no longer get away with such a minimalistic trim. (BTW I edited my previous post, because I left out a full sentence, no idea where it went. sorry.)

Yes, I know, old school V8 enthusiasts don't care about plastics and 90s style 3" DIC screens and crappy audio etc., some would probably be okay even with cranking their windows by hand, but whether there are enough of them in Gen Z and Gen Alpha to sustain a no-frills Camaro in 2028 and ahead, that is the big question.

One thing I always wondered, especially after seeing the 45-minute 6th gen factory tour video, is that since the car is already built to order, every car on the line is different with matching large parts trays traveling along each vehicle, why we couldn't have more freedom in optioning each Camaro. For example, I could've chosen the 2SS trim with 1LE seats but a leather steering wheel, no electronic diff, light gray door cards and headliner to open up the interior a bit, and so on.

This way even a barebones trim could be optioned exactly as people want it and not have to jump right into the 2SS price range for something trivial like a HomeLink transmitter. Allowing more or ideally full customization didn't look particularly expensive, again, given how it's already being catered to, just within artificial limits.

> especially after seeing the 45-minute 6th gen factory tour video,
Where can I see this? Ive only seen the factory tour for the 5th gen one

 

[bishopts]

I said for years the 5.3 should have been the midline engine instead of the 3.6.
But i also said i wish they would have put the 3.6 twin turbo engine from the ATS in as a special edition engine. It made more power than the LT1.
The 5.3 would have made better fuel economy than the 3.6 with the ability to have the v8 exhaust tone.

So moving forward the 5.5 N/A would be great as a midline engine option. It wouldn't have the low end torque the 6.2 has but it would definitely have more than the 3.6, and mid to high rpm would be pretty great. The combo would have the potential to get out of the hole without spinning and then ramp up power as the rpm comes up.

 

[arpad_m]

It was taken down from youtube, but yours truly saved it, here you go:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/5dot...ey=kk51za04ii3jbclpaw2cs7xhw&st=yf60fcoz&dl=1

> especially after seeing the 45-minute 6th gen factory tour video,
Where can I see this? Ive only seen the factory tour for the 5th gen one